Originally Posted by eonsx311
I havn' read the article yet but are they blaming the inferior cement used in construction (i think it was Agregate co. that supplied it)
actually, in this case, they're saying that it was a steel tieback that broke, not the concrete that gave way. although you're right. it's known that shitty concrete was used in this project. the whole thing is just a farce. you'd think something that cost $14.6BIL, when it was originally estimated at $2.5BIL, wouldn't be riddled with problems. but that just goes to show you how corrupt things are around here. reason #1,674,126 why i don't want liberals running this country.
oh, and it hasn't helped traffic all that much.