Originally Posted by Tark
And inconsistancies aare normal... even when you look at 9/11 attack(just as an example cause you brought it up) when you look at Micheal moores wirtting, then USA gorverment writting, then Noam Chompsky's writting, then you have people that say it was all a setup by the US government, ect.... Lot of inconsistencies and things that can be proven wrong. what do you think will happen in 2000 years? that what happened on 11 september 2001 will be clear?
Yes, there is a lot of wrong or not quite accurate information. But without any doubt, 2 planes hit the world trade center. No accounts of the situation, that I've heard, discount that. There maybe 1000 books on it, but they all have at least some consistancy. Even things like an encyclopedia have wrong info or have been supplied bad info. But what most religions are basing their whole exsistance on is this one book. This one account of how things went down.
Our recording ability and accuracy is far far FAR superiour than that of people 2000 years ago, yet I do agree that it's not perfect. There's always that human element. But you can look back at records and find that days temperature, and when the last time it rained before 9/11. That's fact, it's not just someones impression of the day and when they last remembered rain and then that info was passed on and on and on and lost and changed and regained and lost and changed.