Old May 9, 2006 | 02:38 PM
  #10  
georgelb's Avatar
georgelb
Suspension ++
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, TX
Default

I am not quite sure what the first two questions are asking...but I will give it a go.


Originally Posted by rover 400 sdi
work this rear suspension improvements ???
The rear-end swings around much easier now, but not too much so. I got a little bit sideways a couple times after this install...but that was really in testing the limits. You really don't know what 95-100% traction is until you hit 101% a couple times.

The car just feels more balanced, and the anti-roll part is definitely pronounced in hard, sharp cornering. Daily drivability really was not affected either; you cannot tell the thing is there until you want it to be.



Originally Posted by rover 400 sdi
is cheaper do it ?
I really have no idea what this one means...I did give a breakdown of the prices in a previous post.



Originally Posted by rover 400 sdi
what do you have at front suspension ?
Front suspension consists of the stock EX swaybar, Skunk2 upper 2pt strut bar, Topspeed lower 4pt brace, Korbach Frame Locks, SPC camber/caster upper arms set to -1.5 camber, JIC Magic FLT-1 dampers, Brembo OE replacement rotors, PBR ceramic pads, and ES graphite impregnated bushings in the swaybar endlinks, upper control arms, lower control arms, and steering rack. I guess the sticky Falken Azenis RT615s would count too.

I am looking to put an ITR swaybar up front too to bring the balance back towards the front just a smidge and get a bit more bodyroll taken care of.
Reply