Hehehe... completely unbiased scientist I would assume:
http://www.sierraclub.org/globalwarm...es/harpers.asp
Lindzen, for his part, charges oil and coal interests $2,500 a day for his consulting services; his 1991 trip to testify before a Senate committee was paid for by Western Fuels, and a speech he wrote, entitled "Global Warming: the Origin and Nature of Alleged Scientific Consensus," was underwritten by OPEC.
Regardless, I welcome scientific discourse. We should investigate and review all sources of scientific evidence that can be provided. But, the perponderance of evidence points that global weather patterns may be adversely affected by our industry, and, gasp, even if global climate change is not hugely influenced by humans, by golly, we'll just have to live with the side effects of cleaner air, cleaner water, decreased dependence on fossil fuels, etc etc.
It's like having home-owners insurance. You wouldn't own a house without being insured, would you? This is the same thing... Global climate change is a very possible event, and if it doesn't happen, we're at least better off to deal with a host of other issues that may arise as well. We should plan and prepare for the future.