Originally Posted by reno96teg
whoa, i didn't realize we had so many historians on HAN. :chuckles:
seriously, people have been studying this stuff for generations and generations, dedicating their lives and souls, and you people think you can accurately answer was is legitimate, and what is not.. what is reliable, what isn't. what is "fact", etc.. in one evening, with a few paragraphs? :lmao:
oh, the arrogance..
i think you are irrogant right now. i dont think the debate here is about "accurately answering" something it's about getting other peoples opinions on this subject and some member think that this finding could be inacurate, some think it is accurate. calling these members arrogant is kind of pushing it dont you think?