Originally Posted by clickwir
He conducted a survey and posted his results. Him being a Dr and from Harvard gives him a ton more credit than you, that's for damn sure. Maybe you don't like the results so you'll just find any excuse to try and discredit the whole thing.
So with that logic, we can easily discredit any religion and/or god. Just find one thing that they state as fact and all we have to do is not like it.
Who the fuck is Moses? Just because he chisled some stones we are to take that as fact?
Basically what it boils down to is the same age old arguement, taking faith and unproven facts as the way things are and not believing things even when they are layed out right in front of you.
yeah, sure, he might have more credit than me, but when did i ever claim to release stats of my own research?? even if i did, i wouldnt blame others for discrediting it because i admit, i will probably be slightly biased if i were to conduct my own study of this. therefore.... you still obviously havent understood my first response... i'll only take stats from an unbiased third party, and it cant be just one study done and/or a small group of subjects either.
it seems almost every outspoken-anti-religion person is on the same immaturity level as every outspoken-pro-religion person.
and dont mix your dislikes and train of thoughts with mine. i never once said that i disliked the study results or disagreed with it. i plainly stated that i will only accept results from an unbiased third party..... like i said before..... twice.