Originally Posted by RB
I didn't think the arguement was whether he existed or not, but whether he was the son of God or not.
:werd: But you can't have irrefutable proof for or against that, which is probably why he's sticking with something more factual.
But then again, even if we can't find evidence from the era that he did exist doesn't mean he didn't exist at all. That argument is only slightly less impossible.