>>>>>>>>I see a sad case of a cokehead being used by the prosecutor to try and sneak in a backdoor ban on abortion. You don't bother to look past the sad case of a woman who did a stupid thing. There's a bigger picture and you don't acknowledge it. Maybe you honestly don't understand it.

How do you know the prosector has the intention of banning abortion by prosecuting a woman who endangered her child? You're creating these crazy assumptions that you cannot back up! Yes I understand the situation at hand here and I see the bigger picture. I see a woman who needs to be prosecuted for endangering her child. The woman was not having an abortion at a licensed clinic. She was smoking crack and had a sick baby as a result. Do you see the difference between Child endangerment and abortion, Benjie? Come on, kiddo, there's a huge difference!

>>>So why should I accept your ideology over mine?

So THIS is the root of our argument? You believe I'm trying to force upon you my ideology? Listen, kiddo, I'm not forcing you to do anything. I don't want you to accept my ideology. Do you believe every discussion/argument that happens that one or both parties are trying to force their ideologies upon the other one? Of course not! You blow my mind with "questionable" statements like that.

>>>>My opinion is more informed than yours.

Cocky. Arrogant. Ignorant. Smug. Overconfident. Brash. The descriptions of you are growing, Benjie. Settle down, you're not that special.

>>>>You don't really think I have a guilty conscience. You're just afraid of owning your words. You're pathetic.

Not surprising. Another post resorting to insults in attempt to form an argument. :sigh: Disappointing actually.

Your last couple of posts, Benjie, are nothing but a pointless web of words. And now you have dragged me into it. Not only are we not discussing the "war on christmas" or any topic of interest anymore; we are throwing insults back and forth.

You indirectly call me paranoid because I feel like Christianity is "under attack." You say there is no attacks on Christmas yet your original proposition was the "Is there a War on Christmas?" Explain to me why you proposed this point if you were going to defy any explanations or arguments in the first place??