>>Cite examples or admit that you made this up.

GLADLY!

Odd/questionable ACLU moves/frivolous lawsuits:

ACLU Defends Woman who is guilty of doing cocaine while she is pregnant and having a baby boy who had high amounts of cocaine in his blood. (Not only will the baby be addicted but it is child endangerment)
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/loc...ocal-headlines

ACLU compares Christians who pray to terrorists. Wow.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=45807

ACLU puts children in danger again. ACLU challenges FLA Sex Predator Laws that require Sex Offenders to stay away from children.
http://www.news-journalonline.com/Ne...AG01080205.htm

ACLU wants to jail teachers who pray/mention God.
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=15287


Frivolous lawsuit: ACLU Sues lawmaker for saying Jesus.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=44628

ACLU Sues Ohio to block them from selling "Choose Life" (tags)plates. The money from the sales would go to pregnant women who can't take care of their children/to put them up for adoption.
http://www.nbc4i.com/news/4422228/detail.html

ACLU wants Child Nudists camps to be legal.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/metro...2512-6855r.htm

ACLU threatens wrestling coach with lawsuit because he prayed with his team.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=42477

ACLU Threatening Child Services because one of their concerts may contain "GOSPEL music"
http://www.10tv.com/Global/story.asp?S=2186170

ACLU wants "F-word" not to be bleeped out on TV.
http://cbsnewyork.com/entertainment/...079161335.html

ACLU Wants sexual consent age to be 13...(13+ year olds have the right to have sex with adults...)
http://www.cjonline.com/stories/0916..._consent.shtml

ACLU makes child pornography easier.. trying to get rid of the Child Pornography Protection Act because it "is against expression of ideas" WHAT?
http://www.reclaimamerica.org/PAGES/...asp?story=1147


ACLU Double Standards:
Anti-Christianity
"Case in point, with former Arizona Governor Jane Hull. In 1998, then-Governor Hull issued a proclamation, declaring a "Bible Week" for her state. The ACLU immediately threatened to sue, claiming a violation of the so-called "separation of church and state." Rather than face a drawn-out legal battle, Hull backed down.

Two years later, the same Governor Hull issued another proclamation—this time commemorating the birth of Buddha. While many anticipated another threat of a lawsuit from the ACLU, none came. This time, an ACLU spokesperson said, "Although we may think proclamations are inappropriate, they may not violate the Constitution. "

http://www.reclaimamerica.org/PAGES/...asp?story=1149
for more odd Anti-Christianity double standards from who else but the ACLU...

Or would you like me to shove 100 more links down your throat? Oh I do love a copy-and-paste session to prove my point...

>>>Second, I don't have a clue what you're talking about. When you make >>a claim like this, you need to either post a link to a news story about it or actually provide details like names and dates. Otherwise the story sounds like complete bullshit, which is what I'm guessing it is.

I did not make this story up either. I heard of it on FOX News and found information not on the threatening lawsuit but on the information on what exactly is on the walls of the Supreme Court building: "The Supreme Court building in Washington, DC features a frieze of Moses carrying two numbered tablets signifying the Commandments alongside depictions of Hammurabi, Solon and other historical figures." The ACLU wanted the all symbols and anything that signified the "Ten Commandments" out of public buildings. This included the two numbered tablets that signified the Commandments in the SUPREME COURT building. (Not the Capitol; I heard this story on Fox when the entire case was popular and a lawyer from the ACLU was complaining something along the lines of"How can we get the Supreme Court do agree with us if they themselves have the Ten Commandments in their building?")


>>>Again, post a link, provide details, or admit that you made this up. I >>mean, seriously, this doesn't even make any sense. Why would the ACLU sue the state if the county is the offending party? Did you even think about this before you posted it?


http://republican.assembly.ca.gov/me...ials&RefID=946
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,119035,00.html
http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=13425
http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/news/...s.asp?id=29497


They sued LA County. Like it makes a monumental difference. Point remains. Bored Liberals = frivolous lawsuits. If you need any more "proof" or links to that story I'll send you about 2,000 webpages that my Google search turned up.