It's fun to drive the 2.4 after driving around the old 2.2 huh?>>

There is almost no comparison. The K-series is better in just about every way. The F-series is, however, a proven engine and I've had absolutely no engine trouble in 164,000 miles of driving...so in that respect, I do hope the new engine provides the same service (although I see no reason why it shouldn't)

She loves the look of the new Mustang too and I have to agree that it looks good. However, she still remembers the pile of junk her '82 'stang was, even though it's not in the same universe mechanically as the newer cars.>>>

The new Mustang isn't even comparable to the latest generation it replaces... much less the 82. I was very impressed with the new Mustang...especially on the inside. Much better materials, fit and finish and design. Almost an exact opposite of what the previous generation was. I was disappointed that Ford decided against IRS and the use of a modified T-bird/Lincoln LS platform... but I doubt the typical Mustang buyer will miss them. The car felt solid (MUCH more so than it's predecessor that felt like an old 70's sedan that it was based upon) and handled much better too. Both engine choices are proven to be durable/dependable...so there should be no reliability problems with the car. I'll strongly consider one if and when I decide to replace the Trans Am.