Why is it that none of you Crustang fans are comparing other categories of 03 Accord vs. Crustang. The only thing that is being compared is performance.
If you want a car that after 36 months only retains about 45% of the value spent (Crustang) vs. the Accords 68% residual.
Or how about luxury . . . the Crustang does not have any.
And just remember the Mustang will always be a Crustang that is only good for straightline acceleration . . . which in my book is called one dimensional. The Accord will always be a all around good performing mid-sized coupe/sedan, the most reliabile/dependable car on the road, the best value in its market, and a perrennial best seller.

Only hardcore narrowminded domestic fans would buy an automobile based on 0-60 and 1/4 times alone. Instead of posting this type of bull**** why don't you go watch NASCAR and get dizzy seeing cars make four left turns hour after hour.