Old Aug 31, 2005 | 01:04 PM
  #13  
asianautica's Avatar
asianautica
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
From: Oceanside, CA
Default

Originally Posted by stickyshifter
There is a difference between having a 4.7l V8 just to get grocery, then there is 1.4 liter with a super charger AND a turbo. I am saying a reasonable size engine, I didn't say VW needs a V8 or V10 in that little thing. Bigger doesn't mean the biggest.

And then there is something called 1.8l and 2.0l, which VW has a lot to spare.
But since this technology allow them to have 120HP/L and 140ft-lb/L, w/ a 2.0L, They'll be getting around 240HP and 280ft-lb of TQ. I'm pretty sure they don't need that kind of performance, so they make the displacement smaller and gain better gas mileage.
I don't really get your argument.
Reply