Originally Posted by reno96teg
as if that article isn't clearly biased (tracking a lie throught the "conservative" media? come on! the mainstream won't even touch the story that sheehan met with bush already)... it also amuses me that they reference another liberal site to support their argument, as if they have any more legitimacy than Fox, who they are trying to rebuff.
i posted the original article, not whatever drudge original quoted from it, and there is a stark contrast there, there's no denying it.
this woman is a nut.
It appears as though the only reason your article would not be considered biased is because it agrees with your point of view on the matter.
Yeah there is a stark contrast between what was said before and what is said now but calling bias simply because it shows facts pointing to a way of thinking you don't believe in is pretty narrowminded.
__________________
"I'll keep my money, guns and freedom. You can keep the "Change."