Originally Posted by Epoch
Actually, what they did to gay marriage wasn't an infringement of federal upon states rights... All they did was say that states could reject the authenticity of wedding documents from other states, which I feel is a violation of federal and constitutional rights, because then it assumes that fully binding legal documents can be found void in other states, and it violates the 14th ammendment.
Also, in the US, "seperate but equal" is not an acceptable solution.
The point is they are trying to intervene at the federal level. Why is a federal amendment needed when the states are creating their own amendments?