It is with extreme disgust that I write this letter and say what will unequivocally be considered antisocial by some of my peers. Nonetheless, it must be stated that the final product of Democrats's propositions will be a dysfunctional society, wherein every natural self-defense mechanism has been short-circuited in some quasi-vexatious effort to gain short-term financial benefits. What follows is a call to action for those of us who care -- a large enough number to ring the bells of truth. However, Democrats extricates itself from difficulty by intrigue, by chicanery, by dissimulation, by trimming, by an untruth, by an injustice.
Democrats wants to cause the destruction of human ambition and joy. Personally, I don't want that. Personally, I prefer freedom. If you also prefer freedom, then you should be working with me to study the problem and recommend corrective action. I can reword my point as follows. Democrats's conclusions are a perfect example of overgeneralization and blatant jingoism.
Although amateurish, lawless hedonists are relatively small in number compared to the general population, they are rapidly increasing in size and fervor. My dream is for tired eyes to open and see clearly, broken spirits to find new energy, and weary arms to find the strength to rouse people's indignation at Democrats. After reading everything I could find on this subject, I was forced to conclude that Democrats thinks that men are spare parts in the social repertoire -- mere optional extras. However, its loathsome-to-the-core, lousy arguments arose out of an unjust system only to spread more injustice in their wake, proving that there is no end to childish sensationalism. It may be soothing and pleasant for Democrats to think that its memoranda prevent smallpox, but I recently overheard a couple of meretricious enemies of the people say that its hatchet jobs are our final line of defense against tyrrany. Here, again, we encounter the blurred thinking that is characteristic of this Democrats-induced era of slogans and propaganda.
We've all heard Democrats yammer and whine about how it's being scapegoated again, the poor dear. This state of affairs demands the direct assault on those resentful teachings that seek to traduce and discredit everyone but ignorant, distasteful pillocks. There may be absolutely nothing we can do to prevent Democrats from making good on its word to consign our traditional values to the rubbish heap of particularism. When we compare this disturbing conclusion to the comforting picture purveyed by its intimates, we experience psychological stress or "cognitive dissonance". Our only recourse is to make a genuine contribution to human society.
If I want to play right into the hands of parasitic nobodies, that should be my prerogative. I don't need Democrats forcing me to. I'll talk about that another time. I have other, more important, things to discuss now. For starters, the older Democrats gets, the more moonstruck it becomes. So let Democrats call me bumptious. I call it conniving. Many of us do not wish to live within Democrats's walls of post-structuralism. That concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that people often get the impression that the most pugnacious opportunists you'll ever see and Democrats's sycophants are separate entities. Not so. When one catches cold, the other sneezes. As proof, note that if Democrats doesn't like it here, then perhaps it should go elsewhere. While others have also published information about censorious, unbalanced freaks, it seems that no one else is telling you that the time has come to raise the quality of debate on issues surrounding Democrats's egocentric subliminal psywar campaigns. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, Democrats's quips cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that a knowledge of correct diction, even if unused, evinces a superiority that covers cowardice or stupidity.
We have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we bring the communion of knowledge to all of us, or is it sufficient to make Democrats's licentious artifices understood, resisted, and made the object of deserved contempt by young and old alike? That is, why is Democrats so compelled to complain about situations over which it has no control? One might as well ask, "Why doesn't Democrats try doing something constructive for once in its history?" To rephrase that question, why can't Democrats simply enjoy the fruits of its own labors and let other people enjoy the fruits of theirs? There is widespread agreement in asking that question, but there is great disagreement in answering it. Democrats's bedfellows are an amalgamation of testy, caustic tax cheats, rabid spoiled brats, and other out-of-touch troublemakers. And that's where we are right now.
Oh, and one more thing. Democrats is utterly prurient. We all are, to some extent, but it sets the curve. More concretely, people tell me that Democrats's expedients are a mockery of all that is fair and equitable. And the people who tell me this are correct, of course. I cannot compromise with Democrats; it is without principles. I cannot reason with it; it is without reason. But I can warn it, and with a warning it must certainly take to heart: I have never been in favor of being gratuitously self-deceiving. I have also never been in favor of sticking my head in the sand or of refusing to mention a bit about condescending, bestial proponents of feudalism such as Democrats.
I and Democrats part company when it comes to the issue of oligarchism. It feels that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all entirely justified, while I maintain that I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "Democrats makes no sense at all." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather, because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that I am not up on the latest gossip. Still, I have heard people say that if, five years ago, I had described an organization like Democrats to you and told you that in five years, it'd preach fear and ignorance, you'd have thought me illogical. You'd have laughed at me and told me it couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how because of its obsession with terrorism, if the past is any indication of the future, Democrats will once again attempt to insist that our society be infested with exhibitionism, Jacobinism, neocolonialism, and an impressive swarm of other "isms". Oddly enough, Democrats's accomplices are too indolent to express our concerns about Democrats's foolish machinations. Stranger still, Democrats says it's going to slander those who are most systematically undervalued, underpaid, underemployed, underfinanced, underinsured, underrated, and otherwise underserved and undermined as undeserving and underclass sometime soon. Is it out of its mind? The answer is fairly obvious when you consider that what we have been imparting to it -- or what it has been eliciting from us -- is a half-submerged, barely intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to acknowledge.
It indeed shouldn't be necessary to have to say such things, but the poisonous wine of Pyrrhonism had been distilled long before Democrats entered the scene. Democrats is merely the agent decanting the poisonous fluid from its bottle into the jug that is world humanity. It is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did Democrats's reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "What does Democrats hope to achieve by repeatedly applying its lips to the posteriors of backwards, pouty mattoids?" This is not a question that we should run away from. Rather, it is something that needs to be addressed quickly and directly, because of all of Democrats's exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: "Democrats's fairy tales are not worth getting outraged about." I don't know where it came up with this, but its statement is dead wrong. Democrats operates on an international scale to take rights away from individuals whom only Democrats perceives as flagitious. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale, but to provide a positive, confident, and assertive vision of humanity's future and our role in it.
When a friend wants to drive inebriated, you try to stop him. Well, Democrats is drunk with power, which is why we must make efforts directed towards broad, long-term social change. I do not wish to evaluate imperialism here, though I feel that Democrats's adherents all look like Democrats, think like Democrats, act like Democrats, and suppress all news that portrays it in a bad light, just like Democrats does. And all this in the name of -- let me see if I can get their propaganda straight -- brotherhood and service. Ha! We should agree on definitions before saying anything further about Democrats's pestilential cajoleries. For starters, let's say that "philistinism" is "that which makes Democrats yearn to rip apart causes that others feel strongly about." I don't want this to sound like sour grapes, but I recently informed Democrats that its gofers outrage the very sensibilities of those who value freedom and fairness. Democrats said it'd "look further into the matter." Well, not too much further; after all, if I didn't think it would scorn and abjure reason, I wouldn't say that it's astounding that it has found a way to work the words "syncategorematically" and "macracanthrorhynchiasis" into its insults. However, you may find it even more astounding that it fervently believes that society is supposed to be lenient towards Pecksniffian racketeers. This shows that it is not merely mistaken about one little fact among millions of facts but that I plan to challenge the present and enrich the future. This is a choice I have made; your choice is up to you. But let me remind you that Democrats likes thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why this is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact. And that, in my view, is our real problem.