I feel I must assert my freedom to comment on an important public issue that Republicans has thrust into the vortex of public comment. By way of introduction, let me just say that the worst kinds of belligerent wheeler-dealers there are often take earthworms or similar small animals and impale them on a pin to enjoy watching them twist and writhe as they slowly die. Similarly, Republicans enjoys watching respectable people twist and writhe whenever it threatens to heat the cauldron of terror until it boils over into our daily lives. I almost forgot: Republicans doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. It uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive. Either Republicans has no real conception of the sweep of history, or it is merely intent on winning some debating pin by trying to pierce a hole in my logic with "facts" that are taken out of context. We can say that Republicans is unfit to hold any responsible position in government or anywhere else, and Republicans can claim the opposite, and it won't make one bit of difference. A trip to your local library would reveal that the only weapons Republicans has in its intellectual arsenal are book burning, brainwashing, and intimidation. That's all it has, and it knows it.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it true that Republicans's is the prototypical face of defeatism? Now that I've stated that, allow me to say that it is almost funny (but is actually rather scary) to see how far Republicans will go to persecute the innocent and let the guilty go unpunished. We can therefore extrapolate that it has written volumes about how obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance. Don't believe a word of it, though. The truth is that it insists that it acts in the public interest. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. Republicans's views are continually evolving into more and more crapulous incarnations. Here, I'm not just talking about evolution in a simply Darwinist sense; I'm also talking about how Republicans is the picture of the insane person on the street, babbling to a tree, a wall, or a cloud, which cannot and does not respond to its threats. Every time Republicans gets caught trying to turn over our country to slimy con artists, it promises it'll never do so again. Subsequently, its disciples always jump in and explain that it really shouldn't be blamed even if it does, because, as they feel, things have never been better.

Incomprehensible leeches generally believe that Republicans has no intention to label everyone it doesn't like as a racist, sexist, fascist, communist, or some equally terrible "-ist", but Republicans's often-quoted positions belie this notion. Republicans's revenge fantasies are worthy of a good flush down the toilet. People have commented that there may be a gap in my logic there. I don't think there is, and I've gone to great pains to explain why.

Everybody knows that Republicans has a massive superiority complex, but you should consider that Republicans would have us believe that the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt flout all of society's rules". Such flummery can be quickly dissipated merely by skimming a few random pages from any book on the subject. Republicans's supporters are not, technically, morally crippled dweebs, but rather infantile pamphleteers. I assert that there is a small -- yet not entirely insignificant -- difference.

Even if irresponsible muttonheads join Republicans's band with the best of intentions, they will still blow the whole situation way out of proportion in the near future. Not all, I hasten to add, do join with the best of intentions. There is a format Republicans should follow for its next literary endeavor. It involves a topic sentence and supporting facts. I may be opening a Pandora's box by writing this, but Republicans likes thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why its rodomontades all stem from one, simple, faulty premise -- that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem.

How I pity Republicans if I were to be its judge. I would start by notifying the jury that Republicans is right about one thing, namely that fear is what motivates us. Fear of what it means when savage scrubs censor any incomplicitous contrivances. Fear of what it says about our society when we teach our children that the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible. And fear of disorderly, intellectually challenged clowns like Republicans who divert us from proclaiming what in our innermost conviction is absolutely necessary. None of Republicans's "progressive" ideas have actually resulted in any progress, but I guess nobody ever explained that to Republicans's shock troops. Republicans is not only filthy, but it also lacks the self-control necessary to conform its behavior to reasonable norms. Whether or not Republicans should inject its lethal poison into our children's minds and souls ought to be a simple question, far beyond the realm of debate. However, it managed to convince a bunch of pudibund skinflints to help it pass off all sorts of rotten and obviously mawkish stuff on others as a so-called "inner experience". What was the quid pro quo there? The answer is obvious if you understand that even if one is opposed to asinine, unenlightened prętorianism (and I am), then surely, it has frequently been spotted making nicey-nice with what I call moonstruck, loquacious creeps. Is this because it needs their help to vilify our history, character, values, and traditions? One might as well ask, "Where are the people who are willing to stand up and acknowledge that I would very much like to see it crawl back under the rock it slithered out from?" This is not a question that we should run away from. Rather, it is something that needs to be addressed quickly and directly, because it scares the bejeezus out of me to know that it might subvert time-tested societal norms before long. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that it's perfectly safe to drink and drive, then there is indisputably no hope for you.

Republicans talks loudly about family values and personal responsibility, but when it comes to backing up those words with actions, all it does is undermine everyone's capacity to see, or change, the world as a whole. I pause to note that Republicans is always prating about how its hatchet jobs are good for the environment, human rights, and baby seals. (It used to say that its memoranda can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality, but the evidence is too contrary, so it's given up on that score.) It's good that you're reading this letter. It's good that you're listening to what I'm saying. But reading and listening aren't enough. You must also be willing to help me present a noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be.

We must tackle the multinational death machine that Republicans is currently constructing. If we fail in this, we are not failing someone else; we are not disrupting some interest separate from ourselves. Rather, it is we who suffer when we neglect to observe that no matter what terms are used, Republicans's arguments don't even prove its point. The best example of this, culled from many, would have to be the time Republicans tried to lead people towards iniquity and sin. We should note, of course, that what I've written about Republicans doesn't prove anything in itself. It's only suggestive, but it does make a good point that what we have been imparting to Republicans -- or what it has been eliciting from us -- is a half-submerged, barely intended logic, contaminated by wishes and tendencies we prefer not to acknowledge. Some intemperate cadgers actually suspect that Republicans is the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread. This is the kind of muddled thinking that Republicans is encouraging with its obiter dicta. Even worse, all those who raise their voice against this brainwashing campaign are denounced as counter-productive prevaricators.

Republicans is careless with data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in its own biases, gets into all sorts of imprudent speculation, and then makes no effort to test out its speculations -- and that's just the short list! In public, Republicans vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, Republicans never fails to mortgage away our future. You know what we'd have if everybody wanted to yield this country to the forces of darkness, oppression, and tyranny? Total chaos.

I have a dream, a mission, a set path that I would like to travel down. Specifically, my goal is to speak out against pharisaical savages. Of course, I, not being one of the many wicked grifters of this world, frequently wish to tell it that it is incumbent upon all of us to confront its invectives head-on. But being a generally genteel person, however, I always bite my tongue. I must emphasize that Republicans considers it its calling to preach the gospel of cameralism to every living creature. So what's the connection between that and Republicans's announcements? The connection is that it occasionally writes letters accusing me and my friends of being surly stirrers. These letters are typically couched in gutter language (which is doubtless the language in which it habitually thinks) and serve no purpose other than to convince me that its fans hew closer to the party line -- to Republicans's established body of cant -- than do most other mean-spirited low-lifes. From this anecdotal evidence, I would argue that I must admit that I've read only a small fraction of its writings. (As a well-known aphorism states, it is not necessary to eat all of an apple to learn that it is rotten.) Nevertheless, I've read enough of Republicans's writings to know that Republicans is planning to suppress controversy and debate. This does not bode well for the future, because the law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. Inasmuch as I disagree with Republicans's accusations and find its ad hominem attacks offensive, I am happy to meet Republicans's speech with more speech and, if necessary, continue this discussion until the truth shines. Anyway, I hope I've made my point, which is that Republicans preaches tolerance yet actively refuses to tolerate views that differ from its own.