Originally Posted by antarius
How so?
I openly admit that if there are things to be found, ruled, or proved to be unconstitutional in the Patriot Act I do not and will not support it -- and I also demand that the rest of our rights are protected with the same vigor.
What's so "out of there" about that?
Just a simple question for you since you have made the staement above.
If items in the patriot act are deemed unconstitutional and therefore damaging to our society as a whole or in part (US society and its government), does this also mean that you agree that those backing those sections of the law should be brought up on charges for the inclusion of these parts of the act?
I am not saying all of the writers of the act I am saying the specific authors of those sections.
I am just curious as I really don't really want to enter this debate all that much.