View Single Post
Old Mar 18, 2005 | 07:31 AM
  #10  
sherwood's Avatar
sherwood
I missed Sean
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 1
From: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Default

Originally Posted by kenton
I wonder how Honda explained that 2.2L > 2.3L to the average consumer. I also think that about the TSX (Customer: But doesn't the RSX make equal horsepower (of the TSX) with -.4L of displacement?)
ikts the same thing american car companies have been doing for years, making cars with more torque....

the TSX has +20 ft-lbs more than the RSX-S

the h23 had a slight advantage over the h22 (last time i checked...)

it's been going on for years, like in ford land
taurus from like 1991 or 92:
3.0 V6<3.8 V6 from mustang<SHO 3.0V6 from yamaha
ini terms of HP
but last time i checked my old 3.8 made suttin like 220 ft-lbs of torque.... which made me very happy when i pressed on the GO pedal
Reply