Originally Posted by Epoch
Reagan's administration funded terrorists, yes or no?
You supported Reagan as a leader and as a representative of your party, yes or no?
Thus, you supported a man and a political party who has aided terrorists. You have supported violence and killing in the name of your party's ideals
PETA is a legitimate and legally recognized non-profit organization, yes or no?
PETA has supported eco-terrorists, yes or no?
Thus, PETA has supported violence and attempted killing in the name of their group's ideals. Although they directly may not have carried these actions out, they helped and aided people who did.
Supporting one, and denouncing the other, is hypocrisy.
Personally, I think PETAs a bunch of wack jobs, not in their goals, but their short-sighted shock campaigns. And this is America, where political and social dissent shouldn't be accepted, but in fact endorsed. And if you can't stand the idea of free speech and independent thought, why don't you leave this country? :usa:
oh wow are you close minded. I gues s if we will go and use generalizations like you did then if you supported Clinton then you support cheating on your wife, lying under oath, having oral sex with interns, allowing babies to be killed through abortions and partial birth abortions, and you also believe in being gay.
Just as ridiculous as that sounds, so does your above statement. Just because you support a president does not mean that you agree with everything that they do/have done
