Originally Posted by bubbrubb
Okay, you got dyno pictures to prove that im assuming? If not, then you can look at these dynos of an f23 boosted 5psi hitting 200whp (which is already faster then a h22) on stock internals.
http://www.honduh.com/showthread.php...&pagenumber=13
And then theres this dude thats hitting 210lb tq @ 2800rpms @ 9psi, and this is on an auto on stock internals!
https://www.honda-acura.net/forums/s...3&page=2&pp=45
But yeah, you can say what you want about whatever, but if you dont have hard facts (dyno picture) then its all hear say, and hear say dont mean shit. And i dont think that 300hp- not 300whp, is that crazy of an assumption when youre boosting the f23's.
Edit: 270whp is over 300hp. Since the rule of thumb is flywheel horsepower is 22% greater then wheel horsepower for automatics, and 17% for manual, that would make your friends accord 329.4hp or 315.9hp depending on what tranny he has.
bubb out
I for the life of me cant remember what mag it was i wanna say turbo and high tech performance but it may have been import tuner. But i bet you didnt see the h22a prelude only boosting 18psi with 590whp(that was with a 35shot though) Yes he had a fully built engine but he did go back with stock compression pistons (maybe he had 11:1 but the stock h22a had 10.5 :1 so its not that big of a diffrence). My point is that one of my friends has a 92 turbo h22a civic hatch BONE STOCK internals @ 314whp check it out at
http://www.tunedbylorange.com/dynocharts.html. I think thats at 7 or 8psi but im not sure. There is 2 dyno charts there one for before he turbo'd it and one after. Bottom line... an f23a will NEVER beat an h22a stock for stock, built for built, or turbo for turbo. You have to turbo an F23 just to keep up with or edge out an h22(i know because another one of my friends has a 98 turbo f23 2dr accord and depending on which one of us catches traction first thats who usually wins... we are about 75/25 in my favor).