Originally Posted by Silhouette
1. As far as I can tell he's been "fighting" this "non-traditional war" in all the "traditional" ways i.e. troops, bombs, missiles, whatever. So you think he KNOWS it's not "traditional" and just wastes all those resources and tax dollars so people will feel more secure? Way to be; and if he's just figuring out that this is a "non-traditional war" when you have supposedly had this figured out all along then I think YOU should be the next republican nominee for Pres.
Even a HANer would be better than Bush.
2. Unless I'm out of my mind with #1 then your comment regarding "common sense" doesn't make much (sense) to me.
I sure do love numbering my points... makes it easy for people to refer back to em.
I never said there wasn't a traditional way to
fight a war on terror, just not a traditional way to win, in the sense that terrorism can any everywhere or no where, all depending on who wants to be a terrorist. This isn't like a country vs. country war. Its idea vs. idea, which has no bounds in terms of land or countries. Got it?