I quoted RB's definition of "war on terrorism" and how it can't be won in the traditional way.

To his quote I said, going by his definition of what war on terrorismis, taking an army and invading Iraq didn't fit his definition.

To put it in a more simple term,

If it's not a traditional war, and we can't win it in the traditional way, why are we doing things in the traditional way (invading iraq).

Last but not least I said most of the debate is a play on words (I can't break that down to be any more simple).