Originally Posted by clickwir
I understand your point and I see the opposite. I feel that NASA is not getting enough money. I don't feel they are stuipd rocks. They are things we can learn from.
There is low gravity on Mars as compared to earth, there's not "no gravity".
i feel that there is only so much we can learn from them and i dont understand why repeated trips to the moon yeild us the same results.... more rocks from the moon and no huge breakthroughs. how many times must we go up there, how many dollars must be spent? cant we just use the moon rocks we already have?
as for no vs. low gravity on mars, if there is enough gravity on mars to hold a human and the regular tools of life - from things as large as cars to things as small as toothpicks - down, i stand corrected. if there isnt, my point remains.... it wont be easy to go about our day to day tasks if we float.