Old Jul 20, 2004 | 10:37 PM
  #8  
GSR4444's Avatar
GSR4444
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in WA
Default

I personally think that KBB is shit. They base most everything off of year, which it should be mileage and year. For expample, they say a 95 gsr with 57k miles on it is worth like 6,300, while if i had a 2000 gsr with 150k, its like 9800 or so. Personally, i would rather have the 95, and i would be willing ot pay more money for that than the 2000. Also, if I had a 95 gsr with 1 mile on it, just 1, it raises the value of hte car like 50 dollars. I would pay 13+ for a 95 gsr with 1 mile on it. I prefer edmunds.com, with their "true market retail value", i think that is much more accurate.
Reply