Old Apr 29, 2004 | 06:06 PM
  #108  
Bl@ck's Avatar
Bl@ck
Sinner
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,599
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Default

Originally Posted by white_n_slow
there is nothing illegal about artistic protest. He could have painted a big sign that said "fawk Bush," "Bush is a so-and-so," etc, and it still would have been legal. If he had been like that wierdo and actually threatened violenc (i.e. "I'm gonna ____ Bush," then it would have been illegal.
i think portraying someones head on a stick conveys that message effectively
Reply