Originally Posted by reno96teg
of course we all know that these lawsuits are frivolous. that does not however stop people from filing them, and some winning.
If a judge or jury award in a civil tort action, then it is by definition the law that the case was not spurious.
that's the point here. enough of the bullshit, use some common sense. even if a case doesn't win, don't you think it costs a lot of money...?
If a
court decides that a case should not have been brought, then the
court has the power to react against a plaintiff that brings a spurious declaration or a frivolous tort action.
In order to preserve the liberty of the subject, in order for our free society to exist as it does in the English speaking world,
the people must have free access to the courts and in many cases history has proved that it is the courts that are the final bastion of liberty.
The courts, and they alone, must decide what is and is not just and is and is not frivolous.