Originally Posted by reno96teg
although, maybe this woman is on to something.. if you pull a stupid publicity stunt, you end up paying for it, not making profit from it. hmm... :thinking:
Yeah, that's what they're aiming for. I dunno though. I personally thought that the stunt was lame but to sue for it? Do we live in a society that can't even deal with the day to day hardship of having to talk to your kids about what they saw? "Lewd conduct" of that type is everywhere and chances are they'll see it at some other inappropriate time down the line whether TV is involved or not. But I guess we'll see what happens...