Originally posted by ZMAN
The NSX is a low production car, unlike the ones you mentioned. Anyway, the NSX is an image car for Honda. Since they're known for making cheap, practical cars, they wanted something to boost their reputation worldwide. That's why they make the NSX, not to make money. They don't sell enough of them to make it a profitable.
As for the comments about the price, if you actually have some info to prove me wrong, post it. I'm tired of answering all of your silly questions. It's called a search engine, use it.
You realize, of course, that if all of your banter about the NSX were true, they would have discontinued it 7 years ago or so. Not to mention the pure fact that the technology of the NSX puts 95% of the cars on the road, and even the Saleen S7 to shame. You'd need to go to Lamborghini, Ferrari, or the $118,000 Porsche 911 turbo (which the NSX doesn't even NEED) to beat it in performance and technology. And what's this thing about Honda making cheap, practical cars. Note how a Civic is at least $2,000 more than a Chevy Cavalier, yet it will drive circles around it, last 3 times as long, and has the same, consitent material and assembly quality as an Accord. How is that cheap? And of the affore mentioned vehicles, other than the Porsche, what exotic car can you use as a daily driver? Not that you'd want to, but it shows the drivability of the NSX, making it just as easy to push to the edge of handling as a Cadillac Sedan deVille! So you don't have to be Michael Schumacher to drive the thing! :madfawk: