Old Jul 18, 2002 | 06:50 AM
  #20  
yianni64's Avatar
yianni64
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
From: Frisco, Texas
Default

Originally posted by ZMAN
Ok then, who's gonna be the first among you to spend $100,000 for this car??

Yeah, that's what I thought. :madfawk:

And another thing. You ask have I ever driven a ****en NSX. NAW! Have you?

The fact is, there are ALOT of cars that deliver the same performance or better for less money.

Big damn deal if the car's handbuilt with an aluminum chasis. That alone doesn't justify the price. Honda only builds a small number of NSX's per year, and loses money on them too. Why? Because THERE'S NO DEMAND. See my first sentence in this post if you still don't get it.
:stupid: :down: :bs: :eh: :dunno:

Wow, you got me there. I dont have the money to buy an NSX so I cant apriciate for what it is. I dont have 20,000 to spend on a car at this point in my life, so does my opnion on a celica not matter? Also, do you have 55,000 to spend on your TVR? O wait, even if u did youd have to import it thru grey market.

As far as AcuraFanatic having driven a NSX, I'll let him asnwer that and make you look like a fool.

Maybe you dont understand the amount of money it cost to handbuild a car, and out of aluminum at that. Find me a cheaper handbuilt car. Also, find me a more reliable handbuilt car. Or find me a more reliable high end sports car at that. You wont. The NSX is one of a kind. It's grip isnt at tight as it used to be when it came out 11 years ago, but then again, I cant think of another car who can hang with the rest of them after 11 years. There's no demand for the NSX? It's a really frickin expensiva car, and therefor the possible market is small.

Just go to google.com and search for 2002 NSX Review, see how positive they all are.

:sqfawk:
Reply