Funny how none of that would need to be done if we hadn't overthrown them in the first place. Most of the Iraqi people believe they were better off under Saddams rule. So....maybe its successfull in our eyes as americans, we are not effected by the problems, but it DOES effect the Iraqi's lives directly. You still haven't answered any questions or given any evidence....you just give your opinions and use terms like probably to support your arguement. Your entire case is 100% speculation.
This is all your own speculation. Most Iraqis are gratefull for what we have done...maybe the few the NYT talks to are not but hey, why would the NYT portray something positive for the Bush administration? You have even quoted facts of mine, dumbass, that support my arguments...and you talk about our case being 100% speculative...look at your own. It has so many holes it is sinking faster that the Titanic.
Actually why don't you go to the New York times site, or search the cable news sites....you'll be sadly disapointed to find nearly 99.9% came from other sources, so that kinda shoots down your "liberal media" defense
:bs: I hate to disapoint you but the NYT has these things called reporters that report on what is happening and then write about it, which is then edited. All of that injects liberal bias. And 99.9% of the time the NYT is reporting directly from their sources...not someone elses. Stop lying!!
And please stop being so ****ing blind. Clinton lied! He blatantly lied! He got infront of the American people, waved his finger, and lied again!! He knew all along he was lying. I don't care if he got a BJ or not...but the fact was it was a stupid BJ he lied about...if he lies about a BJ what else is he lying about?
There are currently, right now, this very moment, this exact instant, WMD that are missing in Iraq. That in and of itself was a reason to go to war...that is why we went to war...that is why war is justified. Like I laid out in another post there are two places that those WMD are. 1) Still in Iraq. or 2) Given to another nation or terrorist group. If #1 is proven true all the anti-war critics can please shut the **** up. If #2 is proven true it will be because of all the opposition that multilateralism at the UN has caused prevented us from going in and getting those weapons before they could have been given away.
Now those are facts. Twist them or try and discredit them as you wish, it is a typical liberal tactic, but it is the truth.
And to answer your question in bold...
WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT, Investigating a blow job or investigated terrorists in flight schools?...we need to understand when this took place.
BUSH WAS NOT IN OFFICE WHEN CLINTON WAS BEING INVESTIGATED! You cannot blame Bush for something that took place whaile he was still a governor. So I ask you...why was Clinton not investigating Al Quada and terrorists? Was it because he was too busy thinking up his next lie to the American people? Was he too busy turning down the Sudanese government when they handed Osama Bin Laden to the US on a silver platter?
You mentioned Clinton launched some cruise missles into Afghanistan in a previous post. Pretty interesting how when the heat was turning up on the BJ thing he used the military to divert attention away so he could launch missles at a couple of tents and a camel.
Bush is cleaning up the mess that Clinton handed to him and democrats and liberals alike are upset he is doing a good job, the AMerican public supports him, and his approval ratings remain high. So what to they do..try and discredit everything.