as for bush and negativity, I think you're being a baby. He's the president, and presidents get shit.
I am not being a baby about this...sure presidents do take a lot of shit, and that is fine. Noone is perfect, that is what makes us human. What bothers me is the fact the media loves to only talk about the negatives...it is the liberal bias that does this.
because there are none
See here is a perfect example of how the media influences the American people. You say there are none. Why? Probabaly because you only here the negatives coming from the liberal media.
again, this is the media, who are scavengers. What do you expect?
I agree. There is nothing more I expect but there is also another side to the story not being portrayed here.
but those arn't the reasons we REALLY went there. We should actually be digging holes, and checking around, looking for the WMD's. But thanks to the bush admisistrations agenda, we're up shit creek without a paddle, or WMD's.
Again I agree, our military should not be policing Iraq...but that is a shitty situation they are in. I would much rather them be digging up the desert but how can you when people keep attacking you. I do not think it is the Bush administrations agenda, I do think it was a severe underestimation of resistance after the war ended that is doing this. And yes that is a fault of the Bush administration particularily Rumsfeld.
NYT is alot more respectable than most publications.
I strongly question this. Awards given by liberals to liberal media organizations don't hold squat in my book.
but the right-wing controls the media. Look at Rush, and CNN, and Fox News. Murdock and all his money. The GOP has many, many influences.
The GOP may have some influences through media...particularily with the cable news channels and talk radio, but the networked news channels and newspapers are strongly controlled by liberals and make for a much larger audience.
Give it time we will find them, till then we have made large successes in this war. That is something you cannot deny. Will you only acknowledge those successes after we find WMD?
well, what about bush lying durring his campain. Everything he said he wouldn't do, he's doing.
What lies? What did he say he would do that he is not? I also do not think that he had planned on spending so much money on a war to fight terrorism. That would change any Presidents agenda.
you act like hes the only one to ever lie. BTW, still quite the story going on in Britian, where they're still trying to figure out why Kelly killed himself after they sourced him for the dossier
Clinton lied blatantly to the American public on purpose. He is not the only one to lie I am sure of it though...however he got cought with both hands in the cookie jar and his pants around his ankles and still lied.
That story in Britain is interesting...still waiting to see how it plays out.
CIA has been saying for quite a while that the intelligence issue wasn't acurate. I blame Rice for allowing it to be put into the State of the Union, and bush for reading it to the people. What a crook.
Like I said it will still be considered as a lapse in intelligence. And the same people that would have to vote for impeachment are the same people that believed the same evidence. To become a hypocrite would be to commit political suicide...now it is just another card they can cash in at a later date. Its all politics.
Oh and save this post...I do not think I have ever agreed with 18sec so much.