Originally posted by DVPGSR
filmpunk,
I see you guys met my buddy.
now you know my co-writer
What bothers me about your post and the media is they only focus on the bad things that are happening in Iraq and anything that can possibly be taken as a negative towards the Bush administration.
well, the first part is right. There's a reason you hear all the bad things. It sells, and people buy it. Then they watch the news channel, and ratings go up.
mass-media economics 101: the story with lies/sex/violence is the story that sells.
as for bush and negativity, I think you're being a baby. He's the president, and presidents get shit. Remember Kosovo, when clinton got sooooo much flack from the GOP?
ahh, but he lied on oath about oral sex....
You never hear about the good things that are going on in Iraq,
because there are none
and if you do it is from a short clip from some Marine Major or Army Captain. MSNBC, CNN, Fox News, etc. focus on the number of people killed,
again, this is the media, who are scavengers. What do you expect?
and the terrorist bombings in Iraq rather than talking about the good things American and British soldiers are doing, like getting schools ready for the school year, donating equipment to hospitals, distributing food, water, and aid to the Iraqi people.
but those arn't the reasons we REALLY went there. We should actually be digging holes, and checking around, looking for the WMD's. But thanks to the bush admisistrations agenda, we're up shit creek without a paddle, or WMD's.
I do not think we are the ones being misled by the media.
but we are
Look at your posts, everything you wrote comes straight from what you learn on the cable news networks or the New York Times...
NYT is alot more respectable than most publications.
I atleast know that those stories are only part of the truth and the very left of the truth.
but the right-wing controls the media. Look at Rush, and CNN, and Fox News. Murdock and all his money. The GOP has many, many influences.
How can you call the war in Iraq a failure?
WMDs?
WMSs?!?!
So far it has been a large success.
WMDS!!!!!!!
If there is any failure to be had it is the fact we did not go sooner...
WMDS!!!!!!!!!!
WMD are still unaccounted for and missing. I hope they are still in Iraq and that the delays to going to war did not give Iraq time to give them to someone else.
god, you're soooooo innocent. how cute.
And the difference between Clinton lying about a BJ and getting in trouble is a large difference to Bush's speaches on Iraq's WMD.
well, what about bush lying durring his campain. Everything he said he wouldn't do, he's doing.
but we've all convieniently forgotten.....
Clinton knew the exact story...
you act like hes the only one to ever lie. BTW, still quite the story going on in Britian, where they're still trying to figure out why Kelly killed himself after they sourced him for the dossier
he knew what he did,
and so does bush.
and still got infront of the American people and flat out lied...
so did bush. But bush is still lying
not only that he also obstructed justice from learning the truth.
kinda like bush obstructing us from learning the truth about Enron?
In Bush's case, if Iraqs WMD are found to not be true then it is a serious lapse in intelligence that duped not only the President but large numbers of Senators and Congressmen as well.
CIA has been saying for quite a while that the intelligence issue wasn't acurate. I blame Rice for allowing it to be put into the State of the Union, and bush for reading it to the people. What a crook.
The only person that would not be tarnished would be Howard Dean.
you know, I might actually vote democrat in '04