Originally posted by dliske
Well 18secFerio, it's nice to see that you've stooped to nothing less than I expected from you.
and I should care.....?
Let's see...you're right,
thats what I've been waiting for.
and differing opinions are wrong,
techniclly they are. After all, what are you guys saying about my opinions.
conservatives are hicks,
and let's not forget that when those who disagree speak up, they are "jackasses, bitches, dumb f*cks, bastards, and fools, amongst all of the other gems you have given us.
its gets the point accross, doesn't it?
That's a hell of a way to carry on a reasonable discussion.
since when was this discussion reasonable? I think it was up until the second person (me being the first) posted on here saying it was "liberal bullshit"
yeah, thats pretty reasonable to me. I'm just doing what you conservatives love taking a stand on: fighting fire with fire.
But, then again, no one accused you of being reasonable.
and I never said I was
Never mind the fact that all your left with is personal attacks.
desperate times call for desperate measures
You often end up contradicting yourself whether you realize it or not.
at least I call out my own faults. I don't know many people, in real life or online, who are so straightfoward.
besides, who DOESN'T contradict themselves. That would fall under human nature, and nobody being perfect.
Oh yeah, none of you bother reading all my posts.....
Now, I mentioned the contradictions, but I really don't want to waste my time going through all of your posts to show you (yep, I did read them all), so I'll just show you one:
Oh, but you are liberal. Much of your political postitioning says so, and, furthermore, you say so on your website. It doesn't matter what you label yourself, it's your views that speak volumes. From your site:
So, if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck...
[/B]
when people think liberal, one word pops into their head: Democrat.
I hate democats. They prey more on minorites than any other party, and frankly, it makes me sick.
if you would bother to look up the definition of libertarian, you would read that I beleive in a government that PROTECTS us rather than putting us in harms way, and allows it's people true freedom. Nobody can tell me smoking weed is bad. I mean, sure, it kills you, but we're all gonna die. I'm enjoying myself, and frankly, the government has no right to tell me what I can and cannot do as long as its only me I'm hurting. Now, this can apply with abortion as well (I'm prochoice, since a woman's body is her decision), and other things up until the point of physical violence, murder, things of the sort. I beleive those are truely the only punishable crimes.
with that said, I beleive I would be lying if I said I wasn't liberal. But the fact remains, I'm not your typical liberal, either. Beleive it or not, I'm actually pretty smart.
I'll give you credit for being so serious about your beliefs, though, and you told us so by saying:
But, I've got news for you...you are a tremendous source of amusement. You are my entertainment, as I find myself laughing at the stuff you come up with. I am constantly amazed at the facts you can twist (like calling the DC sniper a terrorist, for one, but OK). Lighten up. This is an internet forum, and it is supposed to be entertainment.
actually, if you're dumb ass would read the forum, this is on-topic. If you want entertainment, walk your dumb ass to the off-topic forum. I hear that place is a hoot for dumbass's like you.
happy?
When it's all said and done, what you have to say comes down to this:
I think the above quote says it all. There's not a lot I can take seriously from THC induced psycobabble from someone who has alot of growing up to do.
better than the alcoholic psycobabble humanity has been listening to for centuries.
oh, we convieniently forgot about that, huh?
In any event, this thread has gone way off topic,
thanks to people like you.
and I'll admit that this post does nothing to help.
see above.
I'm good at this, huh?
Sure, you can say it wasn't meant for the likes of me, but as I mentioned earlier, you would have been foolish to not expect any dissenting opinions based upon your cut and pasted post.
so what do you post?
reading them shows all you know how to do is "agree." I don't see many actually thoughts coming from you. In fact, blackmagic and dvpgsr are the only two of you conservatives I actually respect. Fastball and yourself aren't too original.
As such, I'm just gonna back out.
thank you. You're doing me a great favore by not having another "Yes"-man posting here. Your opinion has already been covered by about 4 other guys.
what the hell?
and there is nothing to gain by going 'round and 'round.
actually, thats life for you. Round and round, up and down. You're more ignorant than I imagined.
[QUOTE]
Originally posted by sxecrow
[B]
I didn't like oxygen anyway ... (here I wish the :rollseyes: smilie worked)
[B][QUOTE]
actually, I would've picked the :jerkit: smilie.
booo hoooo lets argue over who wrote them instead of the facts put forward in the comment in the first place.
its about the only thing he can argue with me.
Actually they were given to fight Iranians, he then used them to gas the kurds, but us being his ally ... looked the other way.
I mentioned that about a dozen times. Conservatives don't like to accept the facts.
However, you'd be saying exactly the opposite if we were being controlled by another country. You'd probably be one of the first to resist by blowing someone up. I know I would.
the problem with conservatives veiwpoints on the matter of occupation is that just about every country has american forces in it. So, it can be understandable that the rest of the world doesn't like someone elses forces sitting around there area. Especially on the weekends when drunken soldiers run around raping the locals and getting VD.
here in america, we haven't had to deal with that since the late 1700's. In fact, that was one of the reasons we kicked the british out.
but what do I know, I'm just a dumb liberal.
Maybe I'm the only one, but I still don't see how this would take years of planning. I mean ... come on. Buy plane tickets for flights that leave the same time from relatively close locations. Crash the planes after you take control into important structures. I coulda came up with that plan in a matter of hours.
well, they kinda had to learn the layout of the cockpit. I'll say they probably started researching this think in '99. I doubt it started before that.
whats the difference in his eyes? You're either with him, or with Al Queda. Welcome to "1984" - Ignorance is Strength.
conservatives don't understand the term "dystopia"
and the difference would be?
Terrorist: one who engages in acts of terror to complete an objective. I see no difference between these assholes except 1 was here in the good US of A. I guess that disqualifies him as a "terrorist"?
common sense doesn't apply to him