Originally posted by /^Blackmagik^\
the same can be said of liberals being granola eating, tree hugging, hippies.
I didn't like oxygen anyway ... (here I wish the :rollseyes: smilie worked)
Originally posted by dliske
Let's see, who else has devoted time cutting and pasting to make points relative to their NON-conservative beliefs?...Odysseus and Sxecrow come to mind. Now, WHO doesn't like to form their own thoughts?
booo hoooo lets argue over who wrote them instead of the facts put forward in the comment in the first place.
Originally posted by DVPGSR
Uhm...no!!! We gave them samples from the CDC for research and development of civilian purposes, although I will admit we knew they would be used for other purposes. But Iraq developed these weapons after the first Gulf War when they were no longer allowed. These are the onesthat are documented and are now missing. Do you finally get my point or are you going to continue to deny it?
Actually they were given to fight Iranians, he then used them to gas the kurds, but us being his ally ... looked the other way.
Originally posted by DVPGSR
So says you...but are you trying to say that terrorist attack was justified because you think they should not have been there?
However, you'd be saying exactly the opposite if we were being controlled by another country. You'd probably be one of the first to resist by blowing someone up. I know I would.
Originally posted by DVPGSR
9/11 may have happened on Bush' watch but this was planned well before he was elected and the terrorists were in the country when he was sworn in...that is an inteligence failure on Clinton's part.
Maybe I'm the only one, but I still don't see how this would take years of planning. I mean ... come on. Buy plane tickets for flights that leave the same time from relatively close locations. Crash the planes after you take control into important structures. I coulda came up with that plan in a matter of hours.
Originally posted by DVPGSR
Not the world...just terrorists. And because a liberal President didn't do anything we have had a lot of problems it has finally taken a conservative President to fix.[.
whats the difference in his eyes? You're either with him, or with Al Queda. Welcome to "1984" - Ignorance is Strength.
Originally posted by dliske
I am constantly amazed at the facts you can twist (like calling the DC sniper a terrorist, for one, but OK).
and the difference would be?
Terrorist: one who engages in acts of terror to complete an objective. I see no difference between these assholes except 1 was here in the good US of A. I guess that disqualifies him as a "terrorist"?