btw, I still don't see WMD, which complete rules the reasons for war null and void.

I beleive "eminent threat" was a key word, and frankly, I didn't feel the least bit frightened about Iraq. Ever.

I don't care if we knew at some point the Iraqi's HAD something. HAD is kinda like HAS, but it was past-tense, implying they no longer HAVE it. Therefore, if they indeed HAD them, but no long HAVE them, what crimes did Iraq commit?

Oh yeah, they killed thousands of innocent civilians.

guess what, so did our country. But you don't see the Germans bombing the hell out of our cities and capitols, invading our boarders, and taking over our government.

America MUST remain neutral if it's indeed "the land of the free"

otherwise, it's "the land of the oppressers/war-mongers/money-grubbing-swines"

BTW, anyone hear about the Partiot Act #2?