but still, there's been more terrorist attacks against US targets on bushes watch than on clintons. Not just within US borders either.
Oh really...please do elaborate on this one. Any examples?
actually, I'm getting quite sick of people bringing up clinton. it's not like he's the answer
Well when people say we should not be going after terrorists and we would be better off by taking that approach it is only logical to bring up what Clinton did and the results of such actions (or inactions depending upon which side of the coin you are on). I think Clinton showed what happens when you take a pacifist, reactionary stance towards terrorism.
worst statement ever
And how so? Your arguments from the left are getting pretty weak.