Originally posted by DVPGSR
I think the path the Clinton Administration took is a 180 degree opposit from the path the Bush administration has taken. How many terrorist attacks on US interests around the world happened on Clinton's watch? It took one for Bush to say "**** You!" to the terrorists and finally do something about it. And because the US and our allies have been so pro-active now then re-active before we are nabbing terrorists left and right and removed them from their base of operations.
well, considering the attacks on clintons watch were not within our borders, I think its rather ludicris to compare the two terms.
actually, I'm getting quite sick of people bringing up clinton. it's not like he's the answer, but then again, neither is bush.
but still, there's been more terrorist attacks against US targets on bushes watch than on clintons. Not just within US borders either.
I think the stance bush is taking is too hard. This "fuck you" approach doesn't do anything but put salt in the wound.
God forbid we try and find a middle ground. But that would be too logical.
I pray there is not another attack on America...but if there is I hope it is through conventional means and not unconventional. The latter will cause more death and destruction than the former.
worst statement ever.