Old Jul 11, 2002 | 06:52 PM
  #72  
LudeRage's Avatar
LudeRage
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, Maryland
Default

Originally posted by dubster99
Not to start another argument with you, but nitrous is also a form of FI, or "power adder" as called by NHRA
Well I suppose it is technically a form of forced induction but no one really refers to it as one. I mean, a tomato is technically a fruit but who calls it one? Also, I would like to see some real results with that 120 shot of nitrous on a stock block gsr. I can't believe I am the only one here that thinks that is very hard to believe and especially safe. All of you guys are teaming up on me with your "120 shots of nitrous for 550 bucks" statements. How many of you guys actually run 120 shots? If not, why do you find it necessary to bash me about how cheap and effective it is at adding horsepower. I don't understand why this thread is still going on. How can you say I'm wrong for having the OPINION that turbochargers are better than nitrous systems? Nitrous was developed primarily for highly tuned cars to get that extra power. Not for "street racers" to rice out their tegs and civics. This is my last post on this thread, because it is just a brawl of "bias" opinions as someone earlier stated.