Originally posted by Black2000GSR
That "growth overtime" as you put it could simply be various species of primate, or even evidence of microevolution (which I said I'm not refuting).
There have never been any fish found that had legs.
One of the basic premises of Macroevolution is that every form of life started from the same single cellular organism. Therefore, somewhere along the line, a fish had to grow legs (and go from having a respiratory system that is made for underwater breathing, to one made for open air breathing), eventually, this fish would turn into a dinosaur, and eventually these reptiles would have to slowly evolve with half formed wings (which by itself would be refuted by natural selection...undeveloped wings would only get in the way and eventually lead to the dieing out of that species), and eventually we would have lizards with wings.
That's microevolution, and again, I'm not refuting it. But when one of these bird turns into a mammal, I'll admit I'm wrong.
Evolution is a theory developed by a man who thought bugs were formed spontaneously from old food left lying around.
We have found numerous fossils of reptiles, fish, and birds from millions of years ago, but yet not a single fossilized remain of any transitional species that, according to the Theory of Evolution, should have abounded.
If we'd had evidence to prove the Theory of Evolution, then it wouldn't be called a theory anymore.
its more solid to me than anything that the bible says. i would go on about needing evidence, but obviously that wouldn't be fair since faith is believing when there is a lack of evidence. for the time being, i can't respond to the rest of your comments, b/c i don't know if there are the type of transitional species you are looking for, and if there are, i'm too lazy to look for them.
and besides, this went waaaayyy of topic, but i don't think i helped that.
its nice to debate with people who know their shit though, good job man :thumbup: