any comments about this S2000?
#6
looks like a fake sign in the back, as if someone did it in microsoft paint or something, cause it's a ****ty job. I have much love for bimmer, but I still find it funny
#7
I think the S2k needs wider tires. Especially if you go with a SC or Turbo app. The one problem with the S2k is that it is a perfect car for stock applications but once you change something, you need to go slightly wider. I know a few people that keep a 255 on the rear with a SC and the car really likes to spin. More rubber will slow the S2k down a bit but will give it much increased handling. I guess it depends on what you want to do. I will never drag race my car unless I figure out a new rear end for the car. But I definitely will run it on the track and Autocross.. And wider tires will help me out quite a bit. Although when I autocross, I will keep the car as close to stock as possible since I don't want to run against ZO6's and Vipers..
#8
yeah, the S2K unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on how you look at it) doesn't really have much on the aftermarket for it because of it's optimized engineering. And frankly, I"m a bit scared to go SC or TC just cause of the fact it's a tiny 4 cylinder. That's what I have my integra for =) I think you should keep the S 2000 stock, and but a project car on the side. If you're extreme, go for both of them being project cars that's what I"m trying, but this Damn S2K is already pushing it's limits... I have to find out how to do everything safely. For now, I'm more than happy with what it gives me stock wise.
#9
the differences i see are the huge (photoshopped) rear trunk brake light. the wider tires, european rear bumper, painted bottom lip on the rear bumper, and also the after-market exhaust.
i think it looks gross with the tail light like that.
edit: the suspension is different too.
i think it looks gross with the tail light like that.
edit: the suspension is different too.