Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Every picture possible...ever....

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 08:53 AM
  #11  
Tark's Avatar
Tark
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 30,331
Likes: 0
From: Montréal, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by sherwood
Of course this would work, but we wouldn't know what we were looking at. I mean in the first two frames we could see the beginning of the whole universe and never know. Something of this magnitude would require someone to watch a 60FPS film nearly their entire life to see the whole thing. Of course computer could help, first finding anything that resembles a face, then finding a particular skin tone and shape for a person
way longer then a lifetime dude
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 09:58 AM
  #12  
ShaolinLueb's Avatar
ShaolinLueb
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 14,544
Likes: 0
From: Holyoke, MA
Default

Originally Posted by e3NiNe
Lastly, I'll have what you're having.
please pass the drugs.


can you make a filter so it only shows hot naked chicks that are of age rage 21-38?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 01:03 PM
  #13  
b00gers's Avatar
b00gers
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 58,579
Likes: 0
From: Lll
Default

To a certain point. Youre limited with the size of the canvas. Obviously, some images are larger than 1000x1000.
__________________
.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 01:08 PM
  #14  
shirley's Avatar
shirley
CBOTY 2010
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 34,786
Likes: 0
From: MI
Default

man that's some good weed
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 02:15 PM
  #15  
JGordon's Avatar
JGordon
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,152
Likes: 0
From: Golden, CO
Default

The answer is yes, but in asking this question I believe you are seriously underestimating the number of images something like this would produce. I believe the formula for this is (W*L)^C, where W=width of image in pixels, L=length of image in pixels, and C=number of possible colors.

So for a 1000x1000 pixel image with only 16 colors (the number of colors that some of the first color computers were capable of, you would do (1000*1000)^16. This gives you 1.0x10^96. That's a 1 followed by 96 zeroes.

By way of comparison, the universe is ~13.7 billion years old. If you were to look at 1 image per second, the universe has had only ~4.3x10^17 seconds since it began. So you would need multiple billions of times of the age of the universe to look at all of the images created even if you were only using 16 colors. I don't think you'd ever be able to write a computer program that could sort through that kind of information.

But theoretically, yes it would create pictures identical to past and future events. It would, however, also create an image of me murdering my mother with a gun at the moment I was born, or Hitler standing proudly over the corpse of George Washington. So you'd never be able to tell what were 'real' photos and which just happened to resemble possible events.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 07:07 PM
  #16  
DarkStarr's Avatar
DarkStarr
Shake n Bake!
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,794
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

Originally Posted by JGordon
The answer is yes, but in asking this question I believe you are seriously underestimating the number of images something like this would produce. I believe the formula for this is (W*L)^C, where W=width of image in pixels, L=length of image in pixels, and C=number of possible colors.

So for a 1000x1000 pixel image with only 16 colors (the number of colors that some of the first color computers were capable of, you would do (1000*1000)^16. This gives you 1.0x10^96. That's a 1 followed by 96 zeroes.

By way of comparison, the universe is ~13.7 billion years old. If you were to look at 1 image per second, the universe has had only ~4.3x10^17 seconds since it began. So you would need multiple billions of times of the age of the universe to look at all of the images created even if you were only using 16 colors. I don't think you'd ever be able to write a computer program that could sort through that kind of information.

But theoretically, yes it would create pictures identical to past and future events. It would, however, also create an image of me murdering my mother with a gun at the moment I was born, or Hitler standing proudly over the corpse of George Washington. So you'd never be able to tell what were 'real' photos and which just happened to resemble possible events.
sounds like a nicholas cage movie
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 07:11 PM
  #17  
95SiR's Avatar
95SiR
hood rich
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 35,752
Likes: 0
From: los josengeles
Default

i just got home from work and now im taking a dump as i type this.
__________________
In Loving Memory
R.I.P. Huan Vo aka woong
01.14.1979 - 11.19.2008
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 07:25 PM
  #18  
b00gers's Avatar
b00gers
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 58,579
Likes: 0
From: Lll
Default

Originally Posted by 95SiR
i just got home from work and now im taking a dump as i type this.
there is a picture of that
__________________
.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2011 | 11:56 AM
  #19  
sherwood's Avatar
sherwood
I missed Sean
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 1
From: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Default

Originally Posted by JGordon
The answer is yes, but in asking this question I believe you are seriously underestimating the number of images something like this would produce. I believe the formula for this is (W*L)^C, where W=width of image in pixels, L=length of image in pixels, and C=number of possible colors.

So for a 1000x1000 pixel image with only 16 colors (the number of colors that some of the first color computers were capable of, you would do (1000*1000)^16. This gives you 1.0x10^96. That's a 1 followed by 96 zeroes.

By way of comparison, the universe is ~13.7 billion years old. If you were to look at 1 image per second, the universe has had only ~4.3x10^17 seconds since it began. So you would need multiple billions of times of the age of the universe to look at all of the images created even if you were only using 16 colors. I don't think you'd ever be able to write a computer program that could sort through that kind of information.

But theoretically, yes it would create pictures identical to past and future events. It would, however, also create an image of me murdering my mother with a gun at the moment I was born, or Hitler standing proudly over the corpse of George Washington. So you'd never be able to tell what were 'real' photos and which just happened to resemble possible events.
I think it'd be C^(W*H)
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 06:23 PM
  #20  
Red X's Avatar
Red X
x pǝɹ
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,246
Likes: 1
From: Upstate
Default

Originally Posted by sherwood
I think it'd be C^(W*H)
this is correct
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:57 PM.