Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

MLB: October Baseball

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 08:34 PM
  #121  
KirkLS's Avatar
KirkLS
Wannabe ///M3 owner
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,616
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Default

Originally Posted by v6_accord_jerz
:hsugh:

Yea........to the washer. hhhhhhhhhhhhh
My buddy use to have a picture on his myspace that had a Tide bottle then showed a Red Sox jersey. Then it said, "It gets the shit out." and showed an after pic as a Yankees jersey :chuckles:
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 08:48 PM
  #122  
e3NiNe's Avatar
e3NiNe
Thread Starter
#CustomUserTitle
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 63,855
Likes: 1
From: glass case of emotion
Default

LOL @ Michael Barrett.

That's the exact reason why the cubs dumped him back in June ... his defense is horrid. Soriano would throw laser shots from the outfield to home plate ... and Barrett would drop them constantly.

It's sad that's how SD ended up losing this game ... a play at home.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2007 | 08:51 PM
  #123  
KirkLS's Avatar
KirkLS
Wannabe ///M3 owner
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,616
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Default

In his defense he blocked the plate. The throw wasn't great but obviously in time to beat Holliday. When I saw Giles let go of the ball I was like, "wtf is that?" He launched a rainbow to home. Giles is still awesome in my book. I'd pick him for my team any day
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 03:41 AM
  #124  
MQue's Avatar
MQue
We got this
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 13,041
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by v6_accord_jerz
HOLY shit that was the craziest game i've seen in a long time. :eek3: :crazyr:
Yeah that was a great game. I don't think Colorado has what it takes to make it to the 2nd round though.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 06:55 AM
  #125  
JGordon's Avatar
JGordon
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,152
Likes: 0
From: Golden, CO
Default

Question for those who know MLB rules better than me:

Say Holliday was blocked from home plate and didn't tag. However, the catcher never had possesion of the ball, and can't legally block him from the plate. Would be no different than the 2nd baseman not having the ball and knocking over a baserunner on his way to second -- the baserunner would be awarded the base because you can't block him.

Doesn't the same apply at home? The catcher didn't have the ball and blocked him from tagging home, thus meaning he should be safe no matter what, correct?
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2007 | 07:19 AM
  #126  
e3NiNe's Avatar
e3NiNe
Thread Starter
#CustomUserTitle
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 63,855
Likes: 1
From: glass case of emotion
Default

Originally Posted by JGordon
Doesn't the same apply at home? The catcher didn't have the ball and blocked him from tagging home, thus meaning he should be safe no matter what, correct?
this rule is out the window at home plate.

The catcher has the right to protect the plate. The base runner has the right to the basepath.

The catcher must also hold onto possession of the ball during and after the tag. This is why collisions happen so frequently, because the baserunner is trying to jar the ball out of the catcher's mit. By doing so, he'll be safe when touching the plate.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:28 PM.