Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Financial peeps V.Merger and Buyouts

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 07:35 AM
  #1  
Tark's Avatar
Tark
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 30,331
Likes: 0
From: Montréal, Canada
Default Financial peeps V.Merger and Buyouts

Tell me how to explain to someone the difference of a merger and a Buyout?

Hers how I tried to explain it:

Merger with and other CO mean that they are usually in the same industry and want to profit off the potential synergy of joining the 2 organisation even though 1 has to actually buy the other.

A buyout is just a firm buying an organisation and usually they will not manage it long term. There main objective is to buy an organisation and usually divide it up to more manageable companies and sell them for more then they paid for the whole organisation.

So bottom line a merger is a buyout but usually the buyer intends to continue the business and wants to profit off the possible sayings coming from redundancies while a buyout is a reselling of the organisation in more manageable pieces.

Am I right?
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 07:38 AM
  #2  
F22B Prelude's Avatar
F22B Prelude
Rachel Bilson
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,230
Likes: 0
From: South Bend/Walkerton, Ind
Default

Merger - Two companies come to together to capitalize on the same market, ie..SBC and ATT

Buyout - Company gives a bid for each share of stock, usually to buy the entire company
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 07:39 AM
  #3  
Tark's Avatar
Tark
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 30,331
Likes: 0
From: Montréal, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by F22B Prelude
Merger - Two companies come to together to capitalize on the same market, ie..SBC and ATT

Buyout - Company gives a bid for each share of stock, usually to buy the entire company
but even with the SBC and ATT 1 of the organisation had to buy the outstading shares right?
And i have to explain it to peeps that dont understand any financial jargon such and capitalize market
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 07:42 AM
  #4  
F22B Prelude's Avatar
F22B Prelude
Rachel Bilson
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,230
Likes: 0
From: South Bend/Walkerton, Ind
Default

They bought a certain number of shares, I highly doubt SBC had enough money to buy all of ATT, and if im not mistaken, ATT took the wireless back and SBC now holds land lines, while still using the ATT name.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 07:44 AM
  #5  
Tark's Avatar
Tark
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 30,331
Likes: 0
From: Montréal, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by F22B Prelude
They bought a certain number of shares, I highly doubt SBC had enough money to buy all of ATT, and if im not mistaken, ATT took the wireless back and SBC now holds land lines, while still using the ATT name.
i dont see how a merger would be possible if SBC didnt buy all of the shares.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 07:45 AM
  #6  
goon54's Avatar
goon54
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,949
Likes: 0
From: chicago,il
Default

our company says its a merger but it'll feel like a buyout when there company moves into our building and take over...
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 07:46 AM
  #7  
F22B Prelude's Avatar
F22B Prelude
Rachel Bilson
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 11,230
Likes: 0
From: South Bend/Walkerton, Ind
Default

From what i got from searching...ATT split into several different companies and then they all got back together under Southwestern Bell Corp (SBC). So basically they were all the same company just different names...Im really confused
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:13 AM.