06 Si vs Rsx Type s
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: topton,pa
Posts: 2,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lycan
hahah i owned a base rsx today. i guess the guy thought i had a regular civic cuz my badge was stolen.
#13
Originally Posted by Lycan
haha not at all. in fact i wouldve bought a type S if i hadnt found an Si that same weekend. same torque, less horses. i have nothing against the rsx.
#16
I missed Sean
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
the 06 Si isnt as fast as the RSX Type-s
it weighs more and has less power.
the LSD and the ability to launch at a higher RPM (due to the aux. engine mounts) should be overcome easily with the power to weight ratio the RSX has over a Si.
you are talking shit. the stock Si should be good for low 15's high 14's. the stock type-s should be good for high to mid 14's.
and why are you racing a new car? don't you know that you could expand the pistons revving it too high this early in it's lifetime?
it weighs more and has less power.
the LSD and the ability to launch at a higher RPM (due to the aux. engine mounts) should be overcome easily with the power to weight ratio the RSX has over a Si.
you are talking shit. the stock Si should be good for low 15's high 14's. the stock type-s should be good for high to mid 14's.
and why are you racing a new car? don't you know that you could expand the pistons revving it too high this early in it's lifetime?
#19
Originally Posted by crazy
^^^ Exactly.
The only thing is that its more like mid 15s for the Si, and low 15s with the RSX. Few people have cracked into the 14s with a stock RSX.
The only thing is that its more like mid 15s for the Si, and low 15s with the RSX. Few people have cracked into the 14s with a stock RSX.