Originally Posted by sherwood
the RSX is most definatly faster. the Si might get a jump off the line as it has the LSD and it has those extra motor mounts to aid in eliminating wheel hop, not to mention the nicer tires (if you equipp the optional exaltos)
but other than that the RSX underweighs and outpowers the Si, or at least does on paper, i have yet to see an Si at the lot i can drive. BUT- all this still doesnt mean that the Si is the better buy. there are currently 6 type-s at my local acura dealership, i'm betting that if i went there i wouldntn have to twist their arms much to let me get one for well under msrp... as for the Si there just arent enough of them to go around, it's suppply and demand. Yes, I do agree that one would think that RSX-S could be had for well under MSRP. Then again, you may want to wait to and see what '07 brings for the RSX. Since the current RSX is based on what is now the previous model civic one would think that '07 would bring a '06 civic chasis based RSX. Maybe they will get smart and throw the 2.4L from the TSX in there. |
does n e one know how well a stock 94 gsr would hold up to a acura rsx type s?:confused:
|
94 GSR is 7.1 and 02 RSX is 6.1(0 to 60)
|
in theory the gsr has the potential to handle better, because it has 4-wheel double wishbone, to the RSX's front struts. but off the line, the poor gsr would get it's ass handed to it.
|
But on the strip suspension is only key in launch. Type S would ass rape GSR
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:32 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands