What's considered good e.t. for LS with i/h/e
I've heard several people say they've run 15.6 with a LS and just I/H/E, and one say 15.5...
I ran a 17.1 on Sunday, but that's at 5820 ft, with heat problems, and crappy launches (2.6xx 60 ft times, but the launches lasted more than 60ft). For comparison, a stock Type-R ran 15.9 at the same track (on a different day; probably under better conditions and launches).
I have beaten cars that ran 15.6 at 700ft, and one that ran 16.6 at the same track. 16.5 was the time I should have run at that track.
I ran a 17.1 on Sunday, but that's at 5820 ft, with heat problems, and crappy launches (2.6xx 60 ft times, but the launches lasted more than 60ft). For comparison, a stock Type-R ran 15.9 at the same track (on a different day; probably under better conditions and launches).
I have beaten cars that ran 15.6 at 700ft, and one that ran 16.6 at the same track. 16.5 was the time I should have run at that track.
Thanks guys...i just wanted to know to see how i'm doing. I wasn't sure if I was doing well or not. I'm hittin 15.4's at almost 90 miles per hour with i/h/e on my 98 ls. Some say it's good and some say it's not. I do that time with 2.2 and sometimes 2.3 60 foots. Thanks for all the input. Peace
HoLLa at me, H-Q-D
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: StaYing ArouNd thE Bay Way, KiLLaForN-i-A
How about some times are an automatic transmission? I know I know i'm a sucker for smashing in an automatic. But i'm a type of driver thats all about suspension and looks. I have enough power to pass up other vehicles. But then again its all about the driver, in the streets and the freeway.


