Why were the TL and CL lumped in with the Vigor?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Jan 21, 2003 | 09:19 AM

BonzoAPD

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 16,353

Likes: 0

From: Ossining, New York

Why were the TL and CL lumped in with the Vigor?

Yeah these replaced the open spot in the Acura lineup but they are nothing alike. I can see the TL and CL in the same forum since they are practically the same.

Jan 21, 2003 | 09:50 AM

98CoupeV6

lots and lots of fail

Joined: Dec 1999

Posts: 23,004

Likes: 1

From: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit

Why have a seperate forum for the Vigor when we have no Vigor owners on this board? It's all in the name of organization. The TL replaced the Vigor, so the Vigor could be considered a first generation TL. Same reason Legend and RL are paired together.

Jan 21, 2003 | 02:27 PM

AcuraTL

Lord Vader Moderator

Joined: May 1999

Posts: 1,466

Likes: 0

From: Bay Area, CA

I agree. Vigor, TL/CL are all entry level luxury cars so they belong in the same catergory. I do not think there are enough Vigor owners to warrant a dedicated forum.

__________________
Honda-Acura.net Vigor/TL/CL Forum Moderator.
Comptech Icebox, Headers, Exhaust, Lowering Springs and Sway Bars. Mugen front grille. Inspire tailamps. MOMO Sport 18 X 7.5 +42 offset. Axxis Metal Master front/rear pad. 2 Polk/MOMO 10" subs, Orion Xtreme 500.4 amplifier and Alpine CD changer.

Mar 27, 2003 | 03:53 PM

petpad

Junior Member

Joined: Jun 2002

Posts: 21

Likes: 0

I agree with you guys, and I do own a Vigor.... we have most Vigor owners in our own Yahoo club, but we visit here occasionally. As mentioned above the Vigor was renamed TL. Jst look at the Vigor against the 96-98 2.5 TL... pretty close .... Vigor and TL are the same car, just different year-model and evolution.