Notices
News & Rumors Archives Useful threads, previous Cars of the Week, and more.

Toyota recalling 160,000 Tundra pickups

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 10:11 AM
  #1  
mayonaise's Avatar
mayonaise
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,181
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default Toyota recalling 160,000 Tundra pickups

related story here. the NHTSA is requiring toyota to follow a safety regulation they didn't follow with the Tundra pickup. the issue is with a passenger-side airbag cut-off switch, which manually disables the airbag. the intended use is for when you have a child in the front seat and worry that a deployed airbag could cause injury or death. read on for more details...

http://www.cnn.com/2006/AUTOS/07/10/...all/index.html
Report: Toyota recalling Tundras
Auto maker expected to disable airbag cut-off switch meant to protect children; about 160,000 trucks affected.

Monday, July 10, 2006; Posted: 2:49 p.m. EDT (18:49 GMT)

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- In order to comply with federal safety regulations, Toyota will recall its Tundra pickup truck to disable an airbag cut-off switch designed to protect children riding in its front passenger seat.

The recall will cost the Japanese automaker millions, according to a report in the Detroit News, but would be less costly than fully complying with regulations that require vehicles built after 2002 to have a child seat anchor system known as LATCH - lower anchorages and tethers for children - in the front seat if they also have an front-seat airbag shut-off switch.

Toyota will deactivate a switch in the pickups. The switch shuts off the passenger-side air bag unless the vehicle senses that an adult is sitting on the seat. Disabling the switch means the passenger-side airbag will always deploy in case of a front-end accident, making it more dangerous for children who are in the front seat at the time.

Children are at risk of injury or death from airbags, which is why child seats are not allowed in the front seats of vehicles that do not have the cut-off switch.

The paper reports that the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration rule requires that there be a LATCH system in the front seat of the vehicles which have the cut-off switch. Toyota spokesman Bill Kwong told the News that there were engineering problems with installing such a system in the front seats of the 156,555 Tundras sold from model year 2003 to 2005.

Kwong told the paper that the 2006 Tundra does not have the cut-off switch in order to comply with the regulation.

"We always recommend that child seats are used in the rear, as children are safest there," Kwong told the paper. The Tundra has a LATCH system in its backseat that complies with regulations. But one auto safety advocate criticized Toyota for how it is handling the problem.

The Toyota decision to respond to safety regulations in this manner pose "a clear and present danger to the children who ride in child restraints in the front passenger seats of those vehicles," Henry Jasny, general counsel for Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, told the paper.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 10:16 AM
  #2  
Buyimports2's Avatar
Buyimports2
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Default

I'm pretty sure that's a drop in the bucket for toyota. I've heard that toyota and honda have billions in the bank.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 11:21 AM
  #3  
Samson's Avatar
Samson
chris is the devil
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,512
Likes: 0
From: so cal 951 + 760
Default

child seats in front = lame.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2006 | 04:13 PM
  #4  
lexusis350's Avatar
lexusis350
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Default

Another Recall, that is why the Ridgline is better, its cheaper and better quality than a Tundra
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2006 | 06:57 PM
  #5  
97teg's Avatar
97teg
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
Default

Originally Posted by lexusis350
Another Recall, that is why the Ridgline is better, its cheaper and better quality than a Tundra
The Ridgeline and the Tundra are not in the same class. The Ridgeline is not a full size. Apples to oranges.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2006 | 11:43 PM
  #6  
stickyshifter's Avatar
stickyshifter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

Originally Posted by lexusis350
Ridgline ... Tundra

Your off-the-mark sarcastic remark is pretty off base.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2006 | 06:17 AM
  #7  
jaje's Avatar
jaje
HC Racer H5
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
From: KCK
Default

Originally Posted by 97teg
The Ridgeline and the Tundra are not in the same class. The Ridgeline is not a full size. Apples to oranges.
Ridgeline / Tundra do have certain things in common such as passenger interior volume...however the overall function of the truck is where the Tundra is more of a real truck than Ridgeline which is a trucklet

fairness aside most suv/truck owners don't need that ladder frame and v8...they only but it for image
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2006 | 10:41 AM
  #8  
97teg's Avatar
97teg
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
Default

I agree. The honda is great for a city truck which is most of the market in reality. I wish the bed was easier to acces from the side but i guess thats the tradeoff when you go with a unibody. When you live on a farm like we do having the practicality of a full size is nice.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:54 AM.