i heard it was the 95's because it is easyer to tune then the other years.

 

both '94 and '95 are obd1. i have heard you can do a lot more with them as a result.

 

Yes, OBD-I is somewhat less fussy because it monitors fewer aspects of engine performance.

Where do you live, what are your horsepower goals and what's your budget?

If California smog isn't a concern and your power goals warrant aftermarket engine management, the model year debate becomes rather irrelevant.

 

whats the difference between the 96+ teg OBD-II and 94-95 OBD-I..and why are people coverting OBD-II back to OBD-I?

 

why are the 94 and 95's different from like the 97's or the 98's?? arent they the same motor and like....same everything?

 

i think because the 94-95 teggys respond better to modifications on the car then the 96+. The 94 and 95 has obd1 and the 96+ has obd2

 

OBD1 ECU's are chippable. OBD2 ECU's aren't.

They are the same motors, but the OBD1 engines have less sensors and are more receptive to modification. An OBD2 engine has has been converted back to OBD1 will disable all of the new sensors and make it as easy to modify as a stock OBD1 engine.

 

yeah definantly the 94-95 gsr due to the obd 1 so much better less to worry about

 

are the 2nd generation tegs as fast as 3rd tegs?

 

See Däs Schmoo's response.. fewer sensors makes thing easier for tuning with stock management.

No. In addition to the changes in management, there were mechanical changes as well. Read the Integra FAQ to see where the changes occured.


Yes.

If all you're going to do is the standard intake / header/ exhaust / cams, OBD-II is not a death sentence by any means.

Stock to stock? No. Read the Integra FAQ for the 0-60 times and 1/4 mi ET speeds.

---
LINK TO THE INTEGRA FAQ -- READ ME