Notices
Engine Swaps, Tech & Tuning Swaps, N/A Performance, Forced Induction, Engine Management, & Troubleshooting

What setup do u think i should get????

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 25, 2003 | 11:11 AM
  #1  
EdyJun's Avatar
EdyJun
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: LA, CA
Default What setup do u think i should get????

I have a 97 accord lx non vtec 5sp. 64k miles on the car. I have 130hp and I want a bit more kick. (not really interested in NOS) I was reading about the turbo setup, something like a small turbo t2.8 (eclipse maybe) with piping and intercooler. I’m hopping for about 30-35 hp to the wheels. But I need to know first if this is possible and second what I need and how much is everything going to cost me. I always take care of my car and all the maintenance are done. I do 16.2 1/4 now. I m hoping I can shave the 0.2 sec off my time. Also help my 0-60. That’s why I was thinking of a small turbo pulse I have $3500 to spend.

Am some what of a newb so be patient with my stupid questions.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2003 | 11:54 AM
  #2  
crxb16er's Avatar
crxb16er
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 0
From: Tucson AZ
Default

for 3500 id suggest maybe getting a new vtec engine to be dropped in, instead of paying a whole bunch for a turbo which in the long run will decrease ur engine life regardless of how much u take care of it, 30-35 hp is easily obtained with a turbo, but probably easier with other after market parts or a different engine, good luck buddy
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 01:02 PM
  #3  
BLOCK's Avatar
BLOCK
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Default

you will get alot more than 35 hp with a decent turbo setup.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 06:38 PM
  #4  
ZiviCase10287's Avatar
ZiviCase10287
RacinMasonC
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Default

16.2 with a 97 non-vtec accord? rofl BS! show me a timeslip and not no gay g-tech bull. so your saying the 94 ex's with VTEC stock can maybe hit low 17's and your saying with 20 less hp and heavier you can run more than a second faster? rofl... i need proof.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2003 | 09:15 PM
  #5  
sts2poc1's Avatar
sts2poc1
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Aurora, CO
Default

Originally posted by ZiviCase10287
16.2 with a 97 non-vtec accord? rofl BS! show me a timeslip and not no gay g-tech bull. so your saying the 94 ex's with VTEC stock can maybe hit low 17's and your saying with 20 less hp and heavier you can run more than a second faster? rofl... i need proof.
depend where you live to bud, in colorado they run 18's+
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2003 | 04:25 AM
  #6  
ZiviCase10287's Avatar
ZiviCase10287
RacinMasonC
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,166
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Default

thats why i said maybe low 17's
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2003 | 04:41 AM
  #7  
NeroLudeH22's Avatar
NeroLudeH22
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Clifton Park, NY
Default

H22A
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:41 AM.